UK Government Covid Herd Immunity Policy


A policy of homicide


P2

Discussion

Origins of SARS-Cov-2: The WIV, Li-Meng Yan and Porton Down



The UK's current 127,000 deaths from Covid-19 and government inaction are very likely to considerably increase despite vaccines.  The country is in a disastrous situation created by the Johnson government and its medical and scientific advisors with only a never-ending vaccination plan to deal with it.  The virus SARS-Cov-2 is now reluctantly conceded to be a from the Wuhan Instutute of Virology, therefore engineered and unpredictably dangerous.  It should have been treated as such from the beginning. Boris Johnson, Patrick Vallance physician and Chief Scientific Adviser, Chris Whitty, physician and Chief Medical Advisor to the government spoke of it and treated it like the annual 'flu.  It would soon weaken, they said and in the meantime immunity will be gained by infection and ‘herd immunity’.  All virologists in the world would immediately have guessed in December 2019 that this was an engineered virus. The Chinese said that it was air-spread person to person and needed aggressive anti-pandemic action - as they and others successfully took. Those who knew did not speak out and worse still, eminent virologists, geneticists and medical practitioners said at the time and say to this day that the virus is not human-created or modified.  Surely all virologists knew that Wuhan held China's only biosecurity level (BSL) 4 laboratory that contained specimens of some of the most deadly organisms known. 


SAGE committee members in particular are not children.  They know that BSL level 4 laboratories in all countries are used to engineer dangerous novel organisms and biological weapons.  They knew or might have known by simple Google search that Dr Zhengli-Li Shi, team leader in the Wuhan Institute of Virology had learned to create chimeric viruses capable of human infection at the University of North Carolina and the CSIRO Animal Health Laboratory in Australia about ten years previously.  Dr Shi has been carrying out both field research to investigate natural bat viruses, eg the virus RaTG-13 and laboratory research to make them human infective (see appendices). Together with the secrecy of the Chinese government and its hostility to inquiries about the virus why did SAGE keep silence and pursue a 'herd immunity' policy in the UK while people died in China?  SAGE members are well experienced in sophisticated committees, the networking and subtleties of corporate fundraising as well as political patronage.  It’s about access to government money.  With a mass vaccination policy rather than a conventional containment policy, government funds go to pharmaceutical companies which in turn fund university departments that research genetics and viruses.  Such research can be beneficial.  In this case government policy is homicidal.  The SAGE committee and government knew at the time that their policy would kill people and said so.  That is homicide.  It is not a political matter.  It is a matter for the criminal courts.

Dr Li-Meng Yan, is a Hong Kong physician and virologist who was sent to Wuhan by her hospital  laboratory to investigate the new virus.  She is the only virologist in the world to have had unimpeded access to virologists and physicians in Wuhan where the virus emerged.  Now in the USA, Dr Yan says that the virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), that it is an engineered virus and was released intentionally by the Chinese Army that controls the WIV.  She says, moreover, that there is a world conspiracy of silence on the part of virologists.  How could that be?  It’s self-interest.  It is because research jobs, funding and the existence of many university departments and industries depend on the fiction that it is a natural virus.  Genetic manipulation is now the most dangerous technology on the planet. 


Geneticists have been manipulating the fundamental structure of life itself, the genome, as they wish without regard to possible adverse consequences.  The genetics industry spends huge sums convincing politicians and the public that tinkering with the structures of life is safe. This is why virologists maintain the fiction that SARS-Cov-2 infected humans via an animal-mediated mutation.  There is no evidence whatever that this actually occurred. There is indisputable evidence that as long ago as 2010 Dr Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology was creating potentially fatal human infective viruses with teams in the USA and Australia. Links to the two papers produced by these groups are above on this page and in the appendices. There is no rational reason why such human-infective viruses should be created by anyone anywhere if human life has any value.  Those who do not believe what Dr Yan says have a financial or career interest in their beliefs - but no evidence or personal knowledge as she has.  In view of the failure of the World Health Organization (WHO) to obtain definitive information,  Dr. Li-Meng Yan is the world authority on the origin of this virus.

The Covid-19 pandemic is conclusive evidence that genetic manipulation is extraordinarily dangerous - much more dangerous than nuclear technology.  Extremely dangerous though it is, gene splicing kits are available on the internet to anyone.  University departments routinely carry out genetic manipulation of many sorts.  This technology is now so advanced that a virus can be constructed de novo from its four basic building blocks or it can be spliced together as a 'chimera' with pieces of other viruses and the joints erased so that it is indistinguishable from a natural virus. There is also the old-fashioned method of selection by serial animal infection that produces a natural-appearing virus. These and other techniques are now routine in universities and industry but a laboratory is no longer necessary.  A garage or kitchen table is sufficient.

Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, both medical practicioners, with Boris Johnson publicly announced their 'herd immunity' policy to counter the pandemic from this virus - whether engineered or not.  Their policy required the virus to infect most of the UK's population, killing the old, weak and susceptible while giving immunity to the survivors.  They knew at the time that it was lethal and airborn-infective,  It was a policy contrary to all basic medical practice and pandemic defence.  They knew that it would kill people.  Since SARS-Cov-2 emerged in Wuhan close to China's only BSL4 laboratory it was extremely likely that its origin was there and equally likely to be an engineered virus.  Did they themselves, their assistants or students search the internet (as I did) to see what research was being done there? They already knew and if not, our Porton Down laboratory, where similar organisms are kept and doubtless assembled, would have told them. 


Why do we not have an evaluation of SARS-Cov-2 from the BSL4 laboratory at Porton Down?  Porton Down analysed the alleged Novichoc chemical weapon that poisoned three local people in the Skripal case in Salisbury and the government trumpeted its finding, vague though it was, that Russia was responsible..  The public should have the reports from that laboratory in this case with 127,000 dead and in defence of the entire country’s population.   That is precisely the purpose of this laboratory.  Such reports must exist and the government must have them. It is inconceivable that they do not. I suggest that it does not suit the government to release them.  Political fiction suits it better.  All Porton Down reports on the origin and source of this virus should be released without redaction by the self-serving political process.  The standard 'national security' reason for secrecy cannot possibly be justified.

More p3...
Page 2
.
.
.
.