UK Covid Herd Immunity, Vaccines and the Revolving Door
Mr Vallance, the UK's Guardian tells us, is the richest civil servant in history. If so, this is because as former President of Research and Development and a Board Member of Glaxo Smith Klein (GSK) he earned around £4 million per year. He now works as a humble civil servant for two or three hundred thousand pounds per annum. He is also reported to hold 43,000 deferred GSK shares worth £600,000 while advising the government on vaccines policy. GSK make vaccines of course. Now that he has done his part in setting up demand for vaccines Mr Vallance will doubtless soon return to GSK, the pharmaceutical industry or perhaps a bank that finances such companies. He can expect commensurate rewards. Alternatively a tax haven might come into play. That is the 'revolving door'. Mr Vallance and his SAGE colleagues saw immense opportunity in what most of us would see as a humanitarian disaster. GSK is at this moment developing the next generation of SARS-Cov-2 vaccines. These will be needed to counter viral resistence to current vaccines, new variants, loss of immunity and the complex situation of infections by variant mutations of several different vaccines that have been used at the same time. The situation that has been created by these vaccines, together with the virus is unpredictable except in two respects. The public will suffer enormously and the pharmaceutical companies will make huge profits. Added to this is the unpredictability of this engineered virus that quickly showed a propensity to mutate to greater infectivity, lethality and damage to body organs. None of this was factored into SAGE's initial computer model of which Messrs Vallance, Whitty and Johnson were so confident. There are doubtless so many variants world wide that it might be already a failed strategy to use vaccines to control the virus.
As I write, we learn that Mr Vallance's past and future firm Glaxo Smith Klein has gained a very large government contract to make vaccines. For the record I wish to state that vaccines are good and useful. I have no objection to GSK getting government contracts. What I object to is the revolving door system for awarding contracts. More, I object to the creation of demand for vaccines by those entrusted with protection of the public when they permit disease to run free for personal gain.
SAGE, Messrs Vallance, Whitty and Johnson will angrily deny of course that they acted from these motives but I think that they did. How else can their Plan be explained? Whatever their motives, they failed to act aggressively in following standard epidemiological procedures based on what they knew about coronaviruses and what was probable about a virus from the vicinity of China's only BSL level 4 laboratory. As Mr Vallance says, their panel was comprised of world-leading scientists and leading academics. They produced a eugenic plan that was in fact based on the science of immunity as it would apply to a herd of animals, not humans. It was not a moral plan. It was a homicidal plan that explicitly incorporated the spread of infection. Given this plan, we are fortunate to have only 127,000 deaths so far although with the number held down at the cost of three lockdowns and their consequences. These people are not motivated by morality nor by the expectations of their religions and cultures, be they Christian, Muslim or Jewish. Nor even for the welfare of future generations of their own children. The truth is so terrible that it has taken me a long time to understand and accept it. While front-line workers exhausted themselves without protective equipment, suffered illness and died for the public good, government ministers and their advisors acted for money.
The probability of SAGE and this government eliminating the virus from the UK is zero because they are not trying to do that. Ancilliary evidence is their spending £840 million on 'eat out to help out' which spread the virus. The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee found that the 'test and trace' contract, budgeted at £37 billion over two years, has had no effect so far. This enormous sum is inexplicable unless one understands the revolving door and means for transferring public money into private hands. The figure itself indicates corruption. Unless men and women of goodwill can act in the public interest and take action independent of this government and its advisors who have been captured by corporations and money, all our lives and the lives of our children and grandchildren will continue to be at grave risk.
We have been rushed into three lockdowns and mass vaccinations in a pandemic created by our government, not the virus. It is essential that, as soon as possible, aggressive public health measures should be implemented to actually extinguish the virus. Educators, physicians and the media should review the situation, cooperate and engage with the public as the government has not done. These vaccines together with track and trace have not so far brought down infections and deaths as the government falsely claims. The latest lockdown has done it. Lockdowns of course are the crudest possible measure. We need effective public health measures to get the economy working again while avoiding future lockdowns and using vaccines judiciously. It will be said that it can't be done and indeed eminent men have said publicly that it is impossible to eradicate the virus in the UK. They do not wish to try because their dangerous genetic technology and funding should now be subject to close scrutiny and restriction.
The public needs to accept that there will be no return to normal life unless SARS-Cov-2 is extinguished. Only this will gain the commitment that is needed to apply the aggressive non-pharmaceutical measures needed. We need a public learning process in how to behave to avoid infection. It is our behaviour that spreads the virus. We need to learn new patterns of behaviour and to keep to them. The alternative is to submit to the never-ending series of vaccinations that is being planned at this moment. That is the second part of the government's original 'herd immunity' plan. It is as unpredicable and conceivably more dangerous than 'herd immunity by infection', the first part of the plan. This is firstly because variants that kill both young and old might develop. Secondly, variants that are resistant to the large number of vaccines that are in use will create a complex infection environment in which vaccines will probably be useless. We have a similar case at present with bacterial resistance, however it will happen much faster with this virus. Virologists have always known of this possibility.
Our local vicar wisely closed our church before the March 2019 lockdown. I told him a month before the lockdown on 14 February 2020 that this virus was likely a bio-weapon because it came from Wuhan where, with a little internet research, I had learned of the WIV BSL level 4 laboratory there and had found the bio-engineering papers produced by the teams that included Dr Zhengli-Li Shi from the WIV.
Subject: Coronavirus
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:22:38 +0000
From: Christopher King (address deleted)
To: Vicar@xxxchurch
Dear Xxx,
Sorry I sent you the copies of an email intended for xxx but didn't send it to xxx. Basically, there's good reason to think that this virus is an escaped bio-weapon. I hope that we can have a brief talk on Sunday.
In Jesus
Chris K
That is why I do not believe that the SAGE Committee and virologists generally were ignorant that this was probably a dangerous manufactured virus with unknown properties. It nevertheless took a year for Matthew Pottinger, Donald Trump's National Security Advisor to tell UK and other politicians officially and for public consumption, that it is 'probably' manufactured. It is a probability approaching 100% and for practical purposes, certainty. Mr Pottinger knows China. We need the reports from the Porton Down laboratory that SAGE will have had. If engineered, the virus was necessarily engineered as a weapon or research for a weapon. The claim that such viruses are manufactured to study vaccines is ridiculous. With even the suspicion of a bio-weapon, SAGE and the government should have acted immediately and aggressively with standard public health measures - not deliberately allowing infections to rise. We need Porton Down's reports made public without cherry-picking by this government and without hiding behind nonsense about national security and the Official Secrets Act. That Act is to protect the public interest, assuming that government is trustworthy, not to hide government malfeasance from the public. Malfeasance is what we have.
On 4th June 2020 the Sun newspaper reported that the former head of MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove, said that he had seen a study, “...produced by Professor Angus Dalgleish of St George's Hospital at the University of London and Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen, (in which) the scientists claim to have found inserted sections placed on the SARS-Cov-2 Spike surface which could explain how the virus binds with human cells”. Due to his knowledge of other countries’ behaviour and capabilities Sir Richard would be in a good position to judge the probability of China having developed such a virus or even the Chinese army releasing it a Dr Li-Meng Yan has said.
This is a survival situation for ourselves, our descendents and the country. The public has been rushed, fearful, into a vaccines trap. This is clear from the government's early March 2020 'herd immunity' presentations contrary to all medical practice and its failure to implement suitable measures to continue reducing infections following lockdowns. Vaccinations could have been used judciously if the cheap, simple, low technology measures used in South East Asia, China, Australia and New Zealand had been implemented. We are in a situation when we need politicians, media and physicians of goodwill, honesty and courage to match that of our front-line medical workers and other workers who have kept the basic structures of our society functioning. We need people who can genuinely speak truth to power.
Mr Johnson and SAGE have knowingly caused mass homicide. They knew that their policy would mean deaths to many. The UK and the world is involved in an enormous experiment based on rushed vaccines that could soon create, with this virus and its variants, a chaotic national and international infection and viral resistance situation that cannot be defined and therefore cannot be controlled by vaccines at all. We might already be in that position. Politicians and the pharmaceutical companies are running the experiment. They themselves have no idea what the outcome might be and whatever the benevolent motives they claim, both their motives and expertise are shown by their actions and outcomes. The public is both the subject of this experiment and cash-cow for its funding. An experiment cannot be carried out on any individual without their consent. I did not consent to it and nor did the country. There was no transparency or consultation with the public between January and March 2020. We need a cross-party effort by politicians and other professionals across the board who can contribute to eradicating this virus in the UK with emphasis on non-pharmaceutical means. The UK is the geographical area within our control. I do not suggest that we ignore other countries needs, but if the virus cannot be controlled here it cannot be controlled anywhere. We have had three lockdowns and the virus is far from under control or we would not need the vaccines that are being planned several stages of virus mutation into the future.
Watching the Duke of Edinburgh’s funeral it seems that he and Captain Tom were of a generation of British heroes that included my father who fought the Japanese and spent the war in Changi prison, Singapore. Britain’s leaders, shaped by that conflict, did great things for the public good, particularly the National Health Service whose workers have recently demonstrated that same heroic spirit. They also set up a universal pension system, access to good education and university for all children, free university education and good public housing. Our present exemplars are people who put money and personal interest above their obligations to the country, lie without shame, use public resources for personal gain and are willing to trade human lives of this and other counties for personal profit. They have no conception of the public good for this country or any other. Anthony Blair set the standard for this and the present government is following him.
I hope that no-one wants to argue with me that that I don’t know what happened in Wuhan or that I’m not a virologist. Don’t nit-pick or argue legalisms. I’m not interested. Argue with Dr Li-Meng Yan about Wuhan. She’s a virologist, investigated there and is genuinely speaking truth to power. If you don’t like this account, just trust SAGE and the government with their 'herd immunity', massive death toll, three lockdowns and lack of humanity. I see no action to avoid a fourth lockdown. I know when someone is on my side fighting for me and they're not..
We all need to think, not of ourselves but for ourselves, our society and country independently of this disastrous government.
Christopher King MSc DipM DMS
30 April 2021
End of Discussion
Appendices p7...
